“This tautology – could you tell me a bit more about it, Ali?” asked Violet. We had adjourned to the foyer, where, to my surprise, brand-new refreshments had been laid on, with chocolate cake, carrot cake, lemon cake, cheesecake, cupcakes and flapjacks attempting to subvert the government’s healthy-eating offensive.
“Tautology is where you repeat a word or statement needlessly or re-state an idea in different words; it always involves redundancy because the repetition is unnecessary. As I said to Gavina, widget and gadget making is always practical – have you ever heard of theoretical widget and gadget making?”
“No, never.”
“Precisely. Tautology is a fault of style, but it’s actually quite common; there’s plenty of it in FART’s publications.”
“Can you remember any examples?”
“How could I possibly forget? ‘Acceptable performance in this unit will be the satisfactory achievement of the Summative Standards.’”
“What’s tautological?”
“Satisfactory achievement – have you ever heard of unsatisfactory achievement?”
“No, never.”
“That’s why we should omit satisfactory. But this sentence is illogical anyway because performance is not achievement.”
“So what would you say?”
“‘Acceptable performance in this unit will be confirmed by the achievement of the Summative Standards.’ And how about this one: ‘This will improve students’ learning experience positively across the curriculum’?”
“An improvement is always positive?”
“Of course. So?”
“I’d remove ‘positively’.”
“Absolutely. And this one: ‘This will provide a positive incentive for students to improve their literacy and numeracy’?”
“It’s similar: an incentive is always positive.”
“Spot on, Violet. There is a lot of tautology about: collaborate together, good benefit, mutual cooperation, new beginning, new innovation, past history, recall back, revert back, share the same, unite together, successfully give up, unsuccessfully fail, positively improve/ support/ enhance, Morag’s pre-planning – there are literally countless examples.”
“But we are always saying past history, Ali.”
“I bet you are, but history is always past – have you ever heard of future history?”
“Never.”
“Precisely. And I bet you are also saying forward planning.”
“All the time.”
“But planning is always forward, isn’t it? When did you last plan backwards?”
“Never.”
“My point exactly.”
Oh my! Looks like you’re in rare form, Anna!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you so much, Torrie!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Enlightening – As Usual! 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you, Dave; I probably sound like a broken record!
LikeLike
Thanks Anna, as always a perfect explanation, who needs a dictionary.
Loved it
LikeLiked by 1 person
You are very kind, David; you’ve made my day!
LikeLike
Brilliant, Ana. You make everything so easy to understand, as usual. Loved this one. 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
You are a real tonic, Jennie; thank you so much!
xxx 🙂
LikeLike
Beautifully explained. And great examples too.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you kindly, Ankur. Wherever I turn, I encounter ‘forward planning’ and ‘past history’! 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person