“What do you mean what disaster? That which wiped out over 80% of the world’s human population.”
“80% – are you sure? Well, there were the 1932 China floods, the 1556 Shaanxi earthquake, the 1970 Bhola cyclone, the …”
“No, no, no, while I was away.”
“You mean when you were trekking in the outback?”
“Yep. Perhaps I should have kept abreast, but I wanted to experience total isolation. That will teach me.”
“But nothing happened – only Gonzalo.”
“What happened to him?”
“No, no, it was a hurricane. But it killed only four people – nowhere near 80% of the world’s population.”
“Over 80%, actually.”
“Look, you are not making any sense.”
“Well, so why did they write this?”
“What?”
“This – look.”
They are amongst the 1.2 billion people around the world, living in what is sometimes called ‘energy poverty’, or ‘off-grid’.
“Oh this, ha, ha, ha!”
“What’s so funny? Before I left, there were over 7 billion people in the world, and now we are down to 1.2 billion – jeez!”
“No, no, no, it’s the comma!”
“Who isn’t making any sense now? How can a comma wipe out 6 billion people just like that?”
“No, no, no, they have no idea that you don’t use the comma with defining clauses. The participial clause beginning with ‘living’ defines the clause about people, which is why we mustn’t separate the two clauses with a comma.”
“We mustn’t?”
“Nope: they belong together. What they should have written is this.”
They are amongst the 1.2 billion people around the world living in what is sometimes called ‘energy poverty’ or ‘off-grid’.
“Hmm, but this publication is supposed to reach many readers – are you sure there was no calamity?”
Splendid! Thank you. I hope you don’t mind me pointing my online students to your blog posts. I live in hope that they will learn the secrets of punctuation.
Oh, Jennie, how could I POSSIBLY mind?!? I am deeply honoured – and would be truly delighted if at least a few of your students decided to follow my blog. Thank you!
Wow, I don’t know what to say – apart from ‘sincerest thanks’. By the way, in my earlier reply to you I should have observed the principle of resolution (the most important bit usually comes last) and written: “but my blog is followed by only 43 people” (because it’s the number that’s communicatively the most important part here). Isn’t grammar glorious?
Excellent, as usual!
LikeLike
My usual thanks, Dave. Your kind comments are a real tonic!
LikeLike
Splendid! Thank you. I hope you don’t mind me pointing my online students to your blog posts. I live in hope that they will learn the secrets of punctuation.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Oh, Jennie, how could I POSSIBLY mind?!? I am deeply honoured – and would be truly delighted if at least a few of your students decided to follow my blog. Thank you!
LikeLike
Anna – thank you. I shall insist that they follow it 😉
LikeLike
Thank YOU!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Anna, you are a global treasure.
LikeLike
Aw, how terribly kind of you. It would be amazing – but only 43 people follow my blog!
LikeLike
All the more reason for your enlightened 43 to treasure you.
LikeLike
Wow, I don’t know what to say – apart from ‘sincerest thanks’. By the way, in my earlier reply to you I should have observed the principle of resolution (the most important bit usually comes last) and written: “but my blog is followed by only 43 people” (because it’s the number that’s communicatively the most important part here). Isn’t grammar glorious?
LikeLike